In the not so distant future, brain scans may be as prevalent as DNA evidence in the criminal justice system. This neuroscientific evidence has the potential to correct biases and predict criminal recidivism. But critics argue it could be misleading and difficult to refute. Exploring the brain as a means of assessing intent also raises privacy concerns.
Host Frank Stasio talks with Duke University experts: , professor of law, genome sciences & policy and philosophy; , professor of psychology and neuroscience; , professor of practical ethics; and , professor of psychology and neuroscience.
